[1] It was at the 11 o\u2019clock Eucharist on a recent Sunday. The presiding minister was in the middle of the Great Thanksgiving. \u201cIn the night in which he was betrayed, our Lord Jesus took bread and gave thanks,\u201d he read taking the host in his hand for us all to see. \u201cThis is my body, given for you,\u201d and somewhere across the center aisle from where wife Carol and I were kneeling and a bit to the front came a child\u2019s clear voice, \u201cUh oh.\u201d<\/p>\n
[2] After reading Dr. Torvend\u2019s little book, it occurred to me that we all should be saying \u201cUh oh\u201d when we hear \u201cthis cup\u2026new covenant\u2026my blood\u2026forgiveness\u2026.\u201d Change comes in this act, a transubstantiation of bread and eaters, a re-formation of persons, of church, of society. Change envisioned by Jesus, reiterated by Luther, and unimagined by the one who hears and says yes to the invitation, \u201cFollow me.\u201d The recipient of Bath and Meal, says Torvend quoting Luther, \u201cmust take to heart the infirmities and needs of others as if they were your own. Then offer to others your strength, as if it were their own, just as Christ does for you in the sacrament.\u201d<\/p>\n
[3] Uh oh.<\/p>\n
[4] I remain challenged by this little book which broke no new theological or historical ground for anyone seminary trained or familiar with the Reformation and Luther\u2019s life and thought. I found it a fine review of material that once had excited me. If I were still a parish pastor I would be drawn to this book for serious adult catechesis of new members, or at a retreat for church leaders, or a class for any thinking grown-ups curious enough to expose themselves to a bit of crucial history that ought to be having an ongoing influence in the way we are doing church.<\/p>\n
[5] Dr. Torvend is a fine writer in my judgment. I found this short book to be winsome from the start even as I wondered who his intended audience might be. When the package containing my review copy arrived, my first thought was Why? Why an examination of Luther to guide us in our relationship and responsibility with the \u201chungry poor?\u201d Isn\u2019t sola scriptura sufficient? \u201cThey have Moses and the prophets,\u201d was Abraham\u2019s response once when asked for a speaker from the grave to make a persuasive argument. Why go to Luther now for this?<\/p>\n
[6] I was put off too, by what has seemed to me to be a modern Lutheran weakness. Granted, this is a recollection of my M.Div. studies a half century ago (when it was a B.D!) and limited exposure to preaching colleagues as well as my own personal mea culpa. Torvend goes from Jesus as reformer, who makes a direct connection between grace and ethics, to Luther, as though there were no other such reformers before Jesus or between our Lord and ML. To his credit Dr. Torvend mentions the sixth century Benedictines, the eleventh century Cistercians, the thirteenth century Franciscans, but in passing before digging into the sixteenth century which our tradition seems to find uniquely sacred. I for one would value a work as lucid as this one from Dr. Torvend on those other reformations, including the ones that came after Brother Martin (the Wesleys come to mind). But that would be for another audience I guess. Other than those of us particularly influenced or attracted to the 16th century continental reformers, I remain unclear just who the intended audience might be for these \u201cFragments.\u201d<\/p>\n
[7] The \u201cfragments\u201d reference is an appropriate metaphor adopted by the good professor. The reference is to the bread the disciples gather after the feeding of multitudes, \u201cso that none is lost.\u201d We are reminded that there is no systematic treatment of social ethics in either Scripture (the first major division of this book, entitled \u201cFoundations\u201d\u2014a good Lutheran place to start: biblical and theological texts) or what we have of Luther\u2019s thought in many volumes of writings, recorded conversations, and letters (part two is called \u201cDevelopments\u201d). Scripture, sixteenth century context, and Luther\u2019s voice comprise the \u201cfragments\u201d that our author and 21st century disciple, Dr. Torvend, takes up in his basket for our consumption.<\/p>\n
[8] My favorite biblical text is in Mark 6 where Jesus says to his disciples, \u201cYou give them something to eat.\u201d Torvend tells us that it is \u201cbetween the plea [for food] and the promise\u201d [\u201ca feast of fat things\u2019] that is the place where we live. He is clear that the biblical witness, the church\u2019s Eucharistic tradition, Luther\u2019s liturgical and ecclesial reforms, all include fragments and allusions to broad ethical responsibility with regard to the hungry poor (and by extension, any of those vulnerable to the world\u2019s destructive reach). These fragments are like those twelve baskets left over, gathered \u201cso that none is lost.\u201d<\/p>\n
[9] Wisely, we are not given a proposed program of social reform nor detailed rules to cover every possible human encounter. Only the \u201cYou give them something to eat.\u201d We must figure out what that means here where we live between the plea and the promise.<\/p>\n
[10] Uh oh.<\/p>\n
[11] Part of the very readability of this little volume is found in Torvend\u2019s clever chapter titles, my favorite (can you guess that I am one of the few remaining liberals?\u2014this in the interest of full disclosure) is \u201cThe Church Fishes for Wealth.\u201d Also in the interest of full disclosure, I have in my 40 years of public ministry been on some of those fishing expeditions myself. The last chapter\u2019s title, \u201cGreed Is an Unbelieving Scoundrel\u201d is a nearly equal favorite.<\/p>\n
[12] Maybe it just should not be necessary to connect social responsibility with the Reformation history that has influenced our current fundamental theological assertions. But, of course, we should not sin either. Jesus certainly did not hesitate to repeat what had been said before he was on the scene so why not his 21st century disciples? And Torvend did succeed in getting this old bald-headed, ersatz preacher excited again about Luther\u2019s articulation of the gospel.<\/p>\n
[13] Admittedly, there were a few times when it seemed to me that our author was working hard to \u201credeem\u201d Luther by insisting that he did actually, really, truly have a social conscience. That he did care about the hungry poor and the vulnerable. Those unfortunate things he wrote and said about Jews and those revolting peasants to the apparent contrary notwithstanding. And I did think he belabored his one example of the Leisnig parish, not far from Wittenberg, in its attempt to reform society toward actually attending to the hungry poor in a just and generous way. That would be the \u201cLeisnig Agreement\u201d which I had never heard of before. A worthy example, but do I really need to know the precise number of nobles, city council members, citizens, and peasant farmers to be elected to oversee the fair distribution of the weekly collection?<\/p>\n
[14] Yet, the point is well taken: our theology does shape our public policy and our personal behavior. Not that it should shape them. It does. If you want to know what a community, nation, person\u2019s underlying (\u201cFoundation\u201d!) belief system is, observe the way it organizes itself and looks after its most vulnerable citizens.<\/p>\n
[15] We are reminded that Luther, unlike Calvin, did not promote the establishment of a \u201cChristian\u201d government. Remember those \u201ctwo kingdoms?\u201d Nor did he permit the withdrawal from the world. The Gospel cannot become public law (our best efforts to create a just and merciful society will not be the Kingdom of God). We live in that ambiguous and dangerous place between the plea and the promise. Luther knew we could fail, would fail. Jesus knew it too. Remember: Peter never ceased to be the Rock, and going back further, that liar, cheater, that \u201cdeceiver\u201d Jacob, never ceased to be a Patriarch. You are baptized! Remember.<\/p>\n
[16] So what is this book Fortress offers now for sale? A call to repent? To improve preaching\/teaching and sacramental practice? Are we Lutherans doing something wrong or is this an affirmation that we are on the right track with LWR, our world hunger collections, and emergency response teams; the soup kitchens, the food pantries, homeless shelters; the ESL and parenting classes? Is this a warning or a pat on the back?<\/p>\n
[17] I still don\u2019t know. I know that Luther\u2019s search for a merciful God is not precisely our search in this space where we live between plea and promise. We still live in a world of deep misery and great wealth, certainly. What Torvend reports as the progression traced by Luther: his discovery of justification by grace leading to reform of the Mass, to the articulation of the real presence of Christ within the assembly of the baptized announced in proclamation, to the assembly sent to be \u201csacrament\u201d in the world, to the presence of divine graciousness in the midst of suffering and need. Yes. Yet the reformer understood that failure at some point or points in this progression is always possible (likely?). \u201cGreat hope and great dismay cannot be separated\u201d we are told in the preface. The works of Paul, the books named for James and Peter, remind us of that failure.<\/p>\n
[18] Was Luther as \u201cmindful\u201d of the social implications of his discoveries and reforms as Torvend claims? I am suspicious when someone, even a careful scholar and darned good writer, claims to know what his subject was thinking. But that is not the point. There is no need to turn Martin Luther into a 21st century progressive American theologian. How shall we now live when we know this Gospel, is the real question.<\/p>\n
[19] Uh oh.<\/p>\n
[20] Okay. There is nothing uniquely Christian about helping people. That is our \u201cproper righteousness\u201d as Luther called it. It is what all the world needs to be doing. What makes us Christian is our \u201calien righteousness,\u201d a distinction that I am grateful to be reminded of. How has Christ dealt with me becomes the standard for how I relate now to you. Torvend reminds us that there is hunger because God\u2019s commands have been ignored. There is no sin in being rich. The sin is ignoring the beggar at your gate. Grace turns us toward the other. And the prince, Luther insists (in the US of A, this grand old republic that has been good to so many—that would be us, you know), must see that the common good is attended to; that peace and justice are kept. That is the state\u2019s \u201cproper righteousness.\u201d<\/p>\n
[21] Back to my first question: Do we really need this book? I don\u2019t know about you, or even the ELCA that as institution claims to be a piece of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Body. But I needed it. I didn\u2019t know it before I read it. Now I\u2019m glad to have read it. It was the reminder I needed. The remembering, if you will, for living in this space between plea and promise. I hope there are others who will find it so as well. The body, the cup, is indeed \u201cfor you.\u201d For me.<\/p>\n
[22] Uh oh. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[1] It was at the 11 o\u2019clock Eucharist on a recent Sunday. The presiding minister was in the middle of the Great Thanksgiving. \u201cIn the night in which he was betrayed, our Lord Jesus took bread and gave thanks,\u201d he read taking the host in his hand for us all to see. \u201cThis is my […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,42,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-martin-luther","category-income-equality"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n